In 3 cases,Chiranjiwi Roy,the Principal Of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya,Samastipur prima facie appears to be a habitual sex offender on the ground of the evidences collected by me.
Case No 1.A cases of section 354A Of the IPC-After Delhi Gang Rape Case ,section 354A of the IPC has been inserted for the sexual harassment if there is physical touch ,sexually coloured expression etc.A girl,who is an ex -student of JNV has submitted her written statement before me wherein she has admitted that once Chiranjiwi Roy had made call to her home,her father received the call and scolded Chiranjiwi Roy when he expressed his desire to talk with that Girl.Further,she has admitted that she is in the knowledge of the fact that a girl was touched by Chiranjiwi Roy.She also submitted that an another girl had informed her that Chiranjiwi Roy used to touch girls.Such conduct of C Roy amounts to an offence under section 354A of the IPC.This case has not been reported by me in any proceeding like my application sent to the SP Samastipur by the then IG Darbhnaga Zone for the enquiry,my evidences sent to the Deputy Commissioner ,NVS Patna on his request in connection with the complaint filed against C Roy before the National Human Rights Commission ,my evidences sent to the NVS Headquarter in connection with the complaint filed against C Roy before the National Human Rights Commission because i am informed by that girl just a few days back.Case No.2 and Case No.3 has been reported before the aforementioned authorities.
Case No 2.A Case of Section 376 of the IPC-Two boys (ex-students) and closed friend of a girl(ex-student) has admitted before me that after making contact with that girl,C Roy used to call her in his residence.The girl had said before a boy among these two that principal used to assault her sexually.Further,the same boy went to talk with that girl after my advice to make her to come forward for her justice.That girl remained silence and didn't reply anything.I have recorded the statement of a boy among these two wherein he is stating about this allegation.It has been stated by a boy among these two that C Roy used to make contact with her through telephone when she would be at home.So the CALL DETAIL RECORD SHOULD BE TRACED.On the ground of statement of these two boys and call detail record,there must be medical examination of that girl and if the medical examination clears the sexual assault committed by C Roy,then C Roy should be prosecuted under section 376 of the IPC.
Case No 3.A Case of section 376C of the IPC-C Roy is in sexual contact with Ms. Kanchan,Matron of the school.That's why he has unlawfully benefited matron by attempting to get her daughter admitted fraudulently because three times the daughter of Matron has appeared in the JNVST having different name and DOB.In 2011 ,she appeared in JNVST Class Sixth by name Shreya having DOB- 5.10.2000. In 2012 ,she appeared in JNVST Class Sixth by name Vishnu Priya having DOB- 15.03.2003 . In 2013,she appeared in JNVST Class Nineth by name Tulika Kumari having DOB-4.3.1998.The son of matron has applied for JNVST 2011 for class sixth by name Skand Kumar having DOB- 5.10.2000 but the same boy applied for lateral entry of class nineth in 2013 with DOB- 30.12.2000…There once occurred event of trespassing of some boys into the girl’s hostel and the matron defended such boys and concealed this fact.One girl who complained to the Principal in this regard has informed me that even after her information,principal favoured matron and didn’t believe that boys had trespassed into the girl’s hostel.The same girl has informed me that the matron is torturing girls due to the undue protection of principal given to the matron.
Such all conducts of the principal are circumstantial evidences against him with the motive that he is unlawfully helping and defending matron because he has sexual contact with matron…
Now,on the ground of circumstantial evidences and motive,principal can be prosecuted under section 376C of the IPC because he has made sexual contact with matron even being a public servant in authority and custodian of matron,which is rape under section 376C of the IPC…
Now,One more thing has been disclosed that the educational qualification of Ms.Kanchan ,Matron is not shown in the list of staffs displayed on the official website of JNV Samastipur(www.jnvsamastipur.bih.nic.in) but educational qualification of all others staffs have been shown except Ms. Jyoti Kanchan,PET(F).It creates a reasonable doubt that Ms.Kanchan has been appointed by C Roy as a Matron on the contract basis either due to the accessibility,not due to the merit or due to motive of C Roy to quench his sexual appetite by appointing her.How she was appointed without any qualification?
(Photo:- Ms Kanchan,Matron)
............................
No comments:
Post a Comment