Haryana Girls Bravery Case: A Complete Fabricated Story

AN APOLOGY

Firstly, I apologize before my learned friends that in my Facebook status of Today’s Morning, I had stated that one girl fought and other made MMS, so it was publicity stunt and fabrication of false evidences but it was incorrect information and that’s why I have deleted that post.

A RESEARCH ON THE CASE

But now I have made a research on this case and I am confident that this case is a complete fabricated story because:-

1.It has been published in news Articles that one of the sisters said, "We boarded the bus from Rohtak bus stand, this boy started teasing us by trying to give his phone number to us. When we protested, he called his friends and they started making obscene gestures. When I walked up to him asking not to make such gestures, he grabbed me by the neck while others held back my sister."
To rescue her sister, who was being grabbed by the neck, the other sister said she took out her belt and attacked the eve teasers.
Now, logic must be applied. It is alleged that one of the sisters was grabbed by the neck by a boy and other sister was held back by all other boys and the same sister who was held back went to rescue her sister who was grabbed by the neck.
If that girl was held back by the other boys then how she went to rescue her sister? She was under the capture of boys, then how she went? The girl has not stated that firstly she rescued herself from these boys and then went to rescue her sister. So, it is evident that the same girl was not held back and her sister was not grabbed by the neck, so applying belt by her to beat boys was illegal.

2. According to an English news channel, the brave girls, Aarti and Pooja told that the passenger of the bus instead of helping them said, “Chhor do in ladko ko, warna ye tumhara rape kar denge ya acid dal denge. Eisi jagah phek denge ki tumhari laash bhee nahien milega

How the passengers can say such? Does it not appear that the statements of girls are exaggerated in nature?
If it is assumed that the passengers told such, then the question comes when such statements can be told.It is stated “Chhor Do”, meant she had started beating, so the passengers told that “Chhor Do”.The scene of beating has been video recorded and nothing like such alleged statements of the Passengers can be listened in the Video.So there is least probability that the passengers might have told such.

3. It is alleged that the girls were thrown out of the bus by the Passengers. How these all passengers can throw out two victim girls from the bus. We can’t blame all the passengers solely on the ground of the statements of two girls as if these two girls are dry honest and all remaining passengers are corrupt and dishonest. If it is assumed that the girls were thrown out, then it is only possible when the girls would be beating boys without any reasonable ground. In case of eve-teasing, Instead of throwing out these two girls, some of the passengers amongst them after seeing eve teasing against the girls, they would start to beat boys. Instead of beating boys, they have supported boys and rescued girls from beating the boys.

4.The girls went to the village of the accused to forgive the accused but the accused refused to apologize. Under section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, the conduct of a person is also admissible as an evidence. The alleged brave girls who fought very bravely melted their heart very immediately! How a brave girl can melt her heart very immediately if she fought against the eve teasing committed against her? Conduct on the part of the girls reveals that the girls have doubtful conduct. Boys had been selected for Army Job and even knowing that non-apology will send them behind bars and chew up their Jobs, they didn’t apologize. Even Panchayat was mediator and there was the pressure of Panchayat but boys didn’t apologize. Conduct on the part of boys reveal that they were innocent, so they didn’t apologize.

5.It is alleged by the defence and same is stated by an old lady that the girls forced that old lady to leave her seat and thereafter also forced a boy to leave the state and then a boy protested against the girls, then the girls intimidated that boys that she would see him. Then that boy told that if she wanted to see him, then she must take his number and whenever she wants to see him ,she must call him. The allegation made by the girls is that this boy started teasing us by trying to give his phone number to us. That old lady is an independent witness and as such that she can’t be ignored. If we corroborate the fact then it becomes easy to visualize that firstly the girls forced the old lady and that boy to leave the seat and thereafter that boy protested and thereafter that girl intimated to see him and thereafter that boy told her to take his number to see him. So, corroboration reveals that the allegation of eve teasing is itself false. It also reveals that there would be words –clash between boys and girls due to speaking against each other and it would lead girls to make them annoyed and beat boys. Mere words-clash can’t be termed as assault in view of definition of the word “Assault” under section 351 of the IPC.So, converting words-clash into eve teasing is illegal and as such that same can’t form an offence under section 354 of the IPC, which has been applied in this case.

6.Who made MMS doesn’t matter. Whether that lady made MMS at her own desire or made MMS after giving mobile to her by one of the alleged brave girls as stated by the defence doesn’t matter.It doesn’t matter because a person can make MMS with a motive to highlight this event by converting this event into eve teasing and getting publicity by highlighting it.

CONCLUSION

7.My research reveals that there was only words-clash between the parties and same doesn’t amount to eve teasing. It further reveals that the girls have falsely implicated boys only for the publicity. I am of the opinion that the FIR against boys must be quashed and an FIR against both girls most be lodged under section 323 of the IPC for beating boys,under section 182 of the IPC for furnishing false information and under section 500 of the IPC for defaming boys.Further, I am of the opinion that bravery award pronounced to be given to the girls by the State Govt must not be given to them.