Be in touch with me to think something revolutionary and work accordingly....

Sunday, 29 May 2016

DISCRIMINATORY NEWS POLICY

I perused Today's Darbhanga edition of total eight News Papers namely Dainik Jagran,Hindustan, Prabhat Khabar,Dainik Bhaskar, Rashtriya Sahara,Sanmarg,Sunday Times and The Telegraph with an expectation to see two students of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya,Birauli,Samastipur in the Intermediate Result's topper list of CBSE Patna Region or Bihar.CBSE Patna Region First Topper or Bihar First Topper scored 97.2 % marks.Two students of JNV Samastipur scored 97% (Humanities) and 96.8 % (Science) respectively.

The student who scored 97% is the second topper of Bihar State and the first topper of the State from Arts Faculty and the student who scored 96.8 % is the third topper of Bihar State and the second topper from Science Faculty with other students.

Not a single News Paper of Darbhanga edition has published the name of the student who scored 96.8%,but other students who scored 96.8% and less have got place in the topper list of Science Faculty.Except Dainik Jagran, other News Paper have not published the name of the student who scored 97 %,but other students who scored less than 97% have got place in the topper list of Arts Faculty.In the front page of Dainik Jagran,an image of this student with a remarks of 97 % is published, but news contents of Dainik Jagran make three other students who scored less than 97% first,second and third topper.

Similarly,a student of Commerce Faculty who scored 97.2 % and secured first position from Bihar along with a student of Science Faculty has not been given place in many News Paper and students who scored less than him have been made Commerce toppers.

Reasons are best known to editors and correspondents of these news papers,but practices on part of news papers are unfair and inequitable.Unfair and inequitable practices may be termed as Discriminatory News Policy.

Comment Share

28You, Anshu Sharma, Chandan Kumar and 25 others

1 share

Comments

Anant Chaudhary Absolutely

UnlikeReply1May 22 at 8:49am

Ankit Kumar bhai usko paisa mlta h

UnlikeReply1May 22 at 8:49am

Rahul Kumar Ankit Kumar-May be

LikeReplyMay 22 at 12:15pm

Anant Chaudhary There may be unawareness from student and school administration side.They may have failed in providing information regarding toppers to the concerned newspaper.

UnlikeReply3May 22 at 12:27pm

Rahul Kumar May be,but How Dainik Jagran o
nly published the image?

LikeReply1May 22 at 1:42pm

Anant Chaudhary Yes certainly that's a notable point

UnlikeReply1May 22 at 1:42pm

Write a reply...

Anjanee Kumar u already know that media come under capitalist domain.

UnlikeReply1May 22 at 6:35pm

Rahul Kumar yes

LikeReplyMay 22 at 8:04pm

Write a reply...

EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT LAND ACQUISITION

Rahul Kumar

May 25 at 8:34am

EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT LAND ACQUISITION

The case has now been approached to the High Court of Patna and i am the Petitioner.

On dated 5/1/2016,i accompanied by fourteen villagers met the then Collector of Darbhanga Mr Balamurugan D.He called the Executive Engineer, Flood Control Division-2,Jhanjharpur and the Special Land Acquisition Officer,Kosi Project, Darbhanga in Chamber and held that at this juncture embankment can be constructed only if farmers give land on lease,otherwise would be constructed after land acquisition.Thereafter farmers decided to not give land on lease and embankment be constructed only after land acquisition.

They wanted to construct by damaging Standing Crops.But Standing Crops got saved and harvested by farmers of my village i.e.Sughrain,also of some farmers of Baghmara & Laxminiya villages (both villages fall under Sughrain revenue village) and of Fuhia village.Now field is vacant and they will try to construct without land acquisition.But they all know that the case is pending in the High Court,so they must not do so till pendency of case.

The Chief Engineer,Department of Water Resources,Samastipur told me on dated 20/5/2016 while i appeared before him in connection with a First Appeal Hearing u/s 19(1) of the RTI Act,2005 that the Executive Engineer,Flood Control Division-2,Jhanjharpur will seek permission from the Collector, Darbhanga for construction of embankment in Sughrain village of Kusheshwarasthan East Block and the Executive Engineer will inform the Chief Engineer about the permission on next date of hearing i.e.16/06/2016.

I have also met the Principal Secretary,Department Of Water Resources on dated 30/03/2016,but he stated that he will anyhow construct embankment without land acquisition.So,i approached to the Court.

A lot of written complaints have been filed before all concerned authorities.

Why i don't want to make them constructed without land acquisition?

You know that everywhere embankment is being constructed without land acquisition.Other projects of Bihar Govt and other State Govts like UP Govt are too constructed many times without land acquisition.

It is perhaps the first case approached to the Court seeking construction after land acquisition.If in one case,the Court takes strict view and order acquire land expeditiously, then construct embankment, then it will have a large effect on many projects throughout the Country.Other people will come forward with similar cases and thus Govts will have to make expeditious acquisition first.Presently due to failure of mechanism, it takes long time in acquisition and by the excuse of long time taken in land acquisition, they construct without land acquisition and land owners/farmers have to wait for compensation for many years.If project is constructed without land acquisition, then funds allotted for Social Impact Assessment (this Assessment is conducted before Preliminary Notification of acquisition) are chewed up.After construction, there is no relevance of this assessment, hence not conducted.In Darjia-Fuhia Kamla Balan Right Embankment Expansion Project (the Project under which land of my revenue village also falls) , Rs 90 Lakhs have been allotted for this assessment.Rs 90 Lakhs are going to be chewed up,if we give them to construct without land acquisition.Otherwise they will have to conduct assessment at least in my revenue village Sughrain and also in Fuhia where embankment has not been constructed due to our representations,but have been constructed/being constructed in all other villages,except Sughrain and its next village and destination of project i.e.Fuhia.