DUTY TO PAY TAX

I have come across the view of Anant Kumar that the Duty to Pay Tax should be included under article 51A of the Indian Constitution as the fundamental duty of all citizens and even Swaran Singh Committee constituted for Fundamental duties had recommended it to include.I support this view but there is one demerit in making such provision..Fundamental duties shall be applied to all citizens but income tax is not paid by the poor people as it is paid after reaching to a particular level of income.Duty to pay tax can be enforced if whole indirect taxes are removed or reduced to a great extent and there is only one direct tax of 1-2 %. A lot of indirect taxes are imposed from the production of a commodity to its consumption.So all taxes should be removed or should be reduced to a great extent.These taxes are imposed arbitrarily and brutality and it increases the price of a product and it is the main reason of the inflation.Inflation can come down if these indirect taxes are removed or reduced to a great extent.Paying direct tax on overall property should be made compulsory to all by removing or largely reducing indirect taxes and thereafter,it should be mandatory for all citizens to pay tax i.e. Duty to pay tax.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Explanation 2 after proviso of the section 375 of the IPC should be removed which provides without any ground and logic that the sexual intercourse with or without consent with the wife above 15 years of age is not rape.If as per the same Section 375 in sixth condition ,sexual intercourse with or without consent with any woman below 18 is rape,then on what ground 15 years is especially said in the case of wife?

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT,2011 की धारा 11

Chandan Sharma has been threatened of  being implicated falsely and loss of life because he has sent RTI Application to the Block Development Officer seeking information including copies of Muster Roll  of the MNREGA Scheme of his village.On 9 May 2014,the Whistle Blowers Protection Act,2011 has received the assent of president.It is the only act which provides some protection to the whistle blowers.Under section 11 of this act,one can approach to the Competent Authority for the protection against the false case and other injuries.

I suggest Chandan Sharma to use this act for his protection and as per his request,i have prepared an application for him.He should either send this application or an application mentioning section 11 of the Whistle Blowers Protection Act,2011 also to the State Vigilance Commission,the State Information Commission,the National Human Rights Commission,the State Human Rights Commission,the District Magistrate etc.

सेवा में
मुख्य सतर्कता आयुक्त महोदय
केन्द्रीय सतर्कता आयोग
सतर्कता भवन,जी.पी.ओ काम्पलैक्स,ब्लाक A,आई.एन.ए,
नई दिल्ली ,100023

दिनांक-

विषय-THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT,2011 की धारा 11 के तहत सुरक्षा प्रदान करने के संबंध में

महोदय

उपरोक्त प्रासंगिक विषयक बिन्दुवार निम्न तथ्य प्रस्तुत है-

1.मैंने दिनांक 21/5/2014 को खंड विकास पदाधिकारी,मोहम्मदाबाद,जनपद-गाजीपुर,उत्तरप्रदेश को सूचना का अधिकार आवेदन भेजकर ग्राम आबादान उर्फ बैरान में मनरेगा योजना के तहत किए जा रहे कार्योँ से संबंधित सूचना मांगा है।

उक्त आवेदन पत्र की एक छायाप्रति संलग्न है।

2.आवेदन भेजने के बाद दिनांक 27/5/2014 को रोजगार सेवक जितेन्द्र यादव और एक ग्रामीण वीरेन्द्र कुमार यादव द्वारा फोन करके दवाब बनाया गया और सवाल जवाब किया गया कि मैंने सूचना क्यों मांगा है।फिर रोजगार सेवक जितेन्द्र यादव ग्राम आबादान उर्फ बैरान स्थित मेरा घर गया और मेरे पिताजी को प्रभोलन देने लगा कि आपका सब काम कर दिया जाएगा,बस आप चलकर हस्ताक्षर कर दीजिए कि आपको सूचना मिल गई है।मैं गाजियाबाद में रहता हूँ,इसलिए मुझे इसकी सूचना फोन से दी गई।फिर दिनांक 29/5/2014 को मेरी जितेन्द्र यादव से फोन से (7376492812 नंबर पर) बात हुई।जितेन्द्र यादव ने झूठा मुकदमा में फंसाने और गाली गलौज करते हुए जान से मारने का धमकी दिया है।इसलिए इसकी आशंका है कि मुझे झूठा मुकदमा में फंसाया जा सकता है या मेरे विरुध्द कोई अपराध किया जा सकता है।इस बातचीत में उसने स्वीकार किया है कि मनरेगा योजना में इन लोगों के द्वारा फर्जीवाड़ा और गड़बड़ियाँ किया जाता है।

इस बातचीत का मैंने रिकार्डिंग किया है जो सीडी में संलग्न है।

3.प्रार्थना

उपरोक्त तथ्यों और परिस्थितियों के आलोक में श्रीमान से प्रार्थना है कि वे-

(क) The Whistle Blowers Protection Act,2011 की धारा 11 के तहत झूठा मुकदमा में फंसाने के विरुध्द और अपराधों से बचाने हेतु सुरक्षा प्रदान करने की कृपा करेंगे।

(ख) मनरेगा योजना के तहत मेरे पंचायत में हो रही गड़बड़ियाँ का जांच कराने की कृपा करेंगे और भ्रष्टाचार में शामिल लोक सेवको के विरुध्द Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 की धारा 13 और IPC का धारा 409,420,465,466,467,468 और 471 के तहत मुकदमा दायर करवाना सुनिश्चित करेंगे।
सधन्यवाद।

भवदीय

चंदन शर्मा
पिता-योगेन्द्र नाथ शर्मा
आबादान उर्फ बैरान
प्रखण्ड-मोहम्मदाबाद
जनपद-गाजीपुर
राज्य-उत्तरप्रदेश
पिन-233227

संलग्नक

1.दिनांक 21/5/2014 को खंड विकास पदाधिकारी को भेजे गए सूचना का अधिकार आवेदन का छायाप्रति

2.रोजगार सेवक जितेन्द्र यादव के साथ मेरी फोन बातचीत का सीडी
....................

................

Sri Braj Bhushan Dubey Ji,a social worker,Zila Parishad Of Ghazipur,UP and the AAP Parliamentary Candidate 2014 of Ghazipur deserves to be appreciated as he has sent email to the District Magistrate of Ghazipur in connection with the order of the National Human Rights Commission in respect of my complaint on behalf of the students of JNV Ghazipur wherein the District Magistrate has been directed to take action within 2 months and inform same to the complainant (me) .He has informed me that he will file RTI,if no action will be taken by the DM in regard to that order.

He has written in his one status that the police has detained a boy since last six days and he has referred to one Judgement of the Supreme Court Of India (DK Basu Versus Union Of India ) where the Supreme Court has directed that a person can't be detained in the police custody for more than 24 hours.In addition to this judgement,my below analysis may also prove helpful to secure the human rights and fundamental right of that boy.

"अनुच्छेद 22 और CrPC का धारा 76 (In case if arrested on warrant) भी किसी व्यक्ति को 24 घंटे के बाद थाने पर रखने की अनुमति नहीं देती क्योंकि 24 घंटे के भीतर कोर्ट में प्रस्तुत करने कहा गया है।Further,It is clearly written in section 57 of the CrPC that a person can not be detained more than 24 hours in police custody and for keeping a person in Custody after 24 hours,special order should be taken from the Magistrate under section 167 of the CrPC.If that boy is arrested without warrant,then this should be reported to the District Magistrate or Sub Divisional Magistrate,as the case may be,under section 58 of the CrPC. मेरा मानना है कि उस छात्र की मौलिक अधिकार का संरक्षण करने के लिए यह उचित मामला है जिसमें इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय या इसके लखनऊ खंडपीठ में HABEAS CORPUS नामक रिट अवैध तरीके से थाने में रखने और अवैध गिरफ्तारी करने के लिए दायर किया जाना चाहिए।केजरीवाल जी ने भी दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय में गोमती मनोचा,मेट्रोपोलिटन मजिस्ट्रेट के आदेश के खिलाफ HABEAS CORPUS रिट दायर किया था।आप अनुच्छेद 226 के तहत अनुच्छेद 22 के हनन का उल्लेख करते हुए HABEAS CORPUS दायर करे।याचिका दायर करने के अगली दिन सुनवाई होगी।"

How to repeal Article 370?

Mr.Narendra Modi is in  the preparation of repealing Article  370 from the State Of Jammu and Kashmir.
I suggest  Mr. Modi how to repeal Article 370 as to prevent harm which may be caused after repealing all provisions of the Article 370  at  a  time.It will be very harmful to remove all provisions of the Article 370 at a time.So, Step to Step all provisions should be removed.
(i) At First,The power of High Court of J & K should  be increased in the matter of issue any writs as well as in the matter of declaring any law unconstitutional.Because the people of J & K can’t move to high court in matter other than fundamental rights.As you know that fundamental rights are very limited.But all other rights have no less importance.But for the protection of such all other statutory  rights,the people can’t move High Court.The politicians and govt of J & K want to keep people suppressed so that  people  can not have the power and sense to take part actively for the state matter and can be engaged in communalism and it is the only reason for the Seizure of Power of the High Court of J & K.
This is another matter that there is ‘’special autonomy” for J & K.But this is the main matter that there is democracy in J &K.So judiciary of state can’t be seized from its power.So High Court of J & K must have the power to declare any law unconstitutional passed by state assembly.The state assembly can pass such law which can incite  communalism and the HC will have to remain mute.
Supreme Court can’t take part in such interference because there is special constitution for the state passed by its constituent assembly on 26 Jan 1957 which confers this state Special Autonomy  but High Court is also the integral part of state of J & K.High Court or Judiciary is parallel and similar to Govt or state assembly in any state if  Democracy exists in that state. It seems there is no democracy in J & K.
Thereafter,the People of J & K should be given the Right  to move the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court should be provided the power to declare any law unconstitutional passed by the State Assembly  of J & K and the Supreme Court should  have the power to issue all writs.

(ii) Then Secondly,Dual citizenship should  be removed  to the extent  of  giving People of other states  right to take part in the elections to the state assembly.
(iii)And,then  thirdly further removing Dual Citizenship,People of other states should be given right  to acquire,own and dispose of immovable property in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. 

The people of J & K will surely accept such amendments if it occurs step to step.

Article 370  was applied temporarily in the State Of Jammu & Kashmir but it is existing still.It was natural and circumstantial to apply article 370 in Jammu & Kashmir because without article 370,Kashmir was not ready for its accession in India.So without  article 370,Kashmir could agree with Pakistan if Pakistan would provide Kashmir such ‘’special autonomy.” But it’s really amazing because 64  years have passed but the article 370 is existing still . Due to politics on ground of communalism,Govt could not be able to remove this article.
...........................

नरेन्द्र मोदी को पाकिस्तान के शासनाध्यक्ष से वार्ता करने के साथ पाकिस्तान के सेनाध्यक्ष और ISI चीफ से भी वार्ता करना चाहिए।भारत-पाक के बीच आतंकवाद,सीमा विवाद जैसे मुद्दे का हल निकाल पाने में वहाँ की सरकार उतनी सक्षम नहीं है,जितनी वहाँ का सेनाध्यक्ष और ISI चीफ।मोदी को तो कुछ नया करना ही चाहिए।नवाज शरीफ के साथ ही शांति वार्ता प्रक्रिया अटल जी ने शुरु किया था लेकिन सेनाध्यक्ष मुशर्रफ ने कारगिल सेक्टर में हमला करके शरीफ के अरमानों पर पानी फेर दिया और उन्हें अपदस्थ करके निर्वासित भी कर दिया।इसलिए वहाँ की सरकार से वार्ता करके कोई विशेष फायदा होने वाला नहीं है।वहाँ की सेना अभी भी सरकार के नियंत्रण में नहीं है।इसका सबूत कल भी मिला जब नवाज शरीफ का भारत आगमन हो रहा था और उसी समय पाकिस्तानी सेना पूछ सेक्टर में गोलीबारी कर रही थी।यदि मोदी पाकिस्तान के सेनाध्यक्ष और ISI चीफ से वार्ता नहीं कर सकते तो इससे भी बेहतर उपाय है कि भारत को पाकिस्तान सरकार को स्थिर और मजबूत बनाने के लिए सहयोग करना चाहिए ताकि वहाँ की सेना और ISI सरकार के अधीन रहे।यदि सेना और ISI सरकार के अधीन रहेगी तो लगभग सारी समस्या का समाधान हो जाएगा।

GOMATI MANOCHA DESERVES TO BE JAILED

I am  going to prove how Gomati Manocha,the Metropolitan Magistrate who has sent Arvind Kejriwal jail,herself deserves to be jailed.

At the outset,let me introduce you about the provision of the Contempt Of  the  Courts Act,1971.Under section 2 of the Contempt Of the Courts  Act ,1971,there are two contempt  of the  court-civil contempt and criminal contempt...As per the definition of civil contempt,the contempt of court where the order,direction of court and also the legal provision is not followed is civil contempt.This contempt is applied to the Judge and Magistrate also under section 16 of the Contempt of  the Courts Act,1971  and even a Judge and Magistrate can be punished for the contempt of itself which may extend to imprisonment of six months.

How Gomati Manocha has committed herself the contempt of her  own court?

A  Judicial Magistrate is said to commit the contempt of his/her  own  court if he/she fails to consider the legal provision which should be executed for the end of Justice.

Gomati Manocha has failed to consider the provision of section 95  of the IPC  which clearly states that nothing is the offfence which merely causes  slight harm against which no one is expected to made complain.

NOW  come to the alleged defamation of Nitin Gadkari...It is too difficult to prove what harm Gadkari  faced because he has been exposed by the Times Of India which caused more harm against Gadkari but Gadkari didn't prefer to move to court .The  Exposure of the Times Of India made media Chasing Gadkari, resulted in his quittal  from the Pressidential Post of his party.Gadkari had not filed defamation case there,meant Gadkari had not casued such harm .In other words,it could not be expected to made complain as it was slight harm or Gadkari Himself had believed corrupt by not lodging Defamation Suit against the Times Of The India.What the case may be for Gadkari,but it is clear that merely saying  Gadkari  corrupt by Kejriwal  was very slight harm even slighter than the harm caused by the The Times  Of India.So it can't be categorized under the purview of criminal case in view of  the section  95 of the IPC and if it is kept under the purview of criminal case,then also the allegation of Gadkari is baseless as he himself is believing that he is corrupt by the way of not lodging defamation suit against the Times Of India. 

Now let us look into the circumstances which enforced Kejriwal to declare Gadkari Corrupt.Now it is common phenomena to state someone something.Even Narendra Modi has stated Kejriwal an agent of Pakistan without any evidence.It is merely a politics among politicians to  blame  each other which can't create a circumstance to defame any particular person because the present condition has made politicians favourable to blame each other and it has been generalized.So,such sorts of statements can't be kept under the purview of criminal case  in order  to prevent  the misuse of law in view of  the section 95 of the IPC.  

It is well settled observation that mostly politicians and officers are corrupt which society believe.In such circumstances, if a politician moves to court that someone has said him corrupt,then such complaint should be dismissed following the section 95 of the IPC because society believe such politicians corrupt.

Now it is evident that Gomati Manocha has herself contempted her own court by not considering the section 95 of the IPC and thereafter dismissing the complaint on the ground of the section 95 of the IPC.

Let Gomati Manocha be prosecuted under section 16 of the Contempt of the Courts Act,1971 and be punished for 6 six months.

A JUDICIAL REVIEW ON KEJRIWAL’S ARREST ORDER

Arrest of  Kejriwal  has generated  many questions  in my mind  regarding demerits of the Indian Law which were however  made by the British Rule.You ought to know first that the  Code Of Criminal Procedure was made by British Rule in 1898 giving brutal power to police and  court   to exploit Indians  by trapping them in false matter , so that no Indian Could dare to speak a single word against British Rule..It was further  amended and repealed in 1973  but the provision remained almost same.

1.It  is the burning Question of  law why the Defamation case against Kejriwal was not dismissed which a magistrate is empowered in exercise of the power conferred under section 202 and 203 of the CrPC,1973.After taking the statement of Complainant Nitin Gadkari and his witnesses, the complaint case ought to have been dismissed on the ground of  misuse of  law by Nitin Gadkari. Still Gadkari is corrupt,though he has been proved innocent by the Income Tax Department..But you should know that he has been released in the matter of Disproportionate Assets Case, which the Income Tax Department is empowered   to investigate..But one leading Indian News Paper The Times Of India disclosed  a  lot against the same Gadkari which resulted in his quitting from the post of BJP President,but no one observed  this case in the legal pretext to prosecute Gadkari..Neither Govt,nor Court took cognizance into the matter.Gadkari was accused of  installing fake companies having fake directors and  fake addresses. So,Gadkari  is still a corrupt man and he is corrupt till the time when he will be proved innocent in this case by the Supreme Court Of India.So,I don’t find any justification behind the Defamation  Suit filed by Gadkari under section 500 of the IPC.There was one way to stop such suit which misuses the law ,only to hide the actual and corrupt identity of the person like Gadkari.There  must be one amendment in the section 199  of the CrPC which provides  perspective on the prosecution of defamation case. It  should clearly be written  in  the section  199  of  the CrPC  that no court shall take cognizance of the alleged defamation, if the conduct of the complainant appears to be suspicious, doubtful or unworthy of credit  whether there should be or should not be evidences against the complainant. This time the conduct of Gadkari  is Doubtful because  The Times Of India has disclosed a lot against him.Also,he is a person of unworthy of credit as he is one politician  and it is well settled observation  that mostly politicians and officers are corrupt-whether there  should be evidences against them or not.

2.As Kejriwal was not wrong,so it was Non-Judicial to compelling him to furnish bail bond even when he was consistent absent from the Court.If one accused is consistent absent but appears to be guilty, then the furnishing of bail bond appears to be Judicial.There is no provision in the Code Of Criminal Procedure to release  an accused on  undertaking or serving notice to him. There is one provision under section 41A of the CrPC  to  serve notice to the accused to ensure his attendance before police officer. An accused is released on serving notice. There should be such similar provision which should be exercised by the court in such cases where it appears to the court that the matter involves false allegation and it will be not in the end of justice to  furnish bail bond of the accused rather releasing  him on undertaking or serving notice. To secure the human rights of the accused and to meet the end of the justice, after section 41A,another section 41B  should be inserted.

3.I  find one error in the order of Metropolitan Magistrate  that  she has admitted that there is no provision in the CrPC to release  one accused on undertaking and she has explained very deeply the provision of section 436 and the section 441 of the CrPC   to support her claim. If there is no provision of  Undertaking, then How Kejriwal was released earlier on the ground of same undertaking at least on four occasions..Under section 151 of the CPC, the court has been provided discretionary power to work in such case where there is no provision in law but the implementation of that thing is essential for the end of justice. For the sake of justice, the Magistrate  ought to have applied  the power enshrined in the section 151 of the CPC  for following the procedure of   undertaking for which there is no provision ,but this was essential for the  sake of justice.

The Supreme Court Of  India should review the section 151 of the CPC and extend the power of court and scope of area  to exercise its discretion  for the justice.

RTI AGAINST MNREGA

I really Appreciate the work of my Facebook friend Chandan Sharma who is from Ghazipur ,UP..After reading my one facebook status regarding disclosure of scam in land registration through RTI with my help,he sought help from me.After getting help from me and some other friends,he has now filed RTI to the Block Development Officer seeking some information including the copy of Master Roll...He has also helped villagers to lodge complaint to the MO regarding not providing of Ration and Ration Card but falsely showing same in the official record...

He has written in his status:-

"गौरतलब है की मेरे गाँव में मेरा ग्राम प्रधान कोई भी विकास कार्य नहीं करवा रहा है। जैसे-मनरेगा के अंतर्गत कार्य होते नहीं है और पैसे उतार लिए जाते है। अतः मैंने एक आरटीआई फाइल करके ये सब जानने की कोशिश की है।

DISCOVER THE FORMULA OF TIME AFTER ENERGY

STEPHEN HAWKING ने कहा है कि किसी PARTICLE को Velocity of light के Square से ज्यादा Velocity से फेंका जाए तो वह भविष्य में चला जाएगा।Einstein ने किसी PARTICLE को Velocity of light के Square पर फेंकने पर Energy बन जाने का सिध्दांत दिया था।ये स्पष्ट है कि Energy से पहले भी TIME विद्यमान थी।आइन्सटाइन ऊर्जा तक पहुँच गए,लेकिन समय तक नहीं पहुँच पाए।FUTURE या PAST में जाने का सिध्दांत देने से पहले समय की वास्तविक स्थिति पर जाने का सिध्दांत दिया जाना चाहिए।जिस तरह से आइन्सटाइन ने E=MC2(SQUARE) का सूत्र दिया।वैसे ही T=क्या होता है,इसका खोज हो।जब हम समय का सूत्र खोज लेंगे,तभी हम FUTURE और PAST का सूत्र खोज पाएंगे।GOD PARTICLE और SQUARE OF VELOCITY OF LIGHT, GOD PARTICLE और ENERGY तथा GOD PARTICLE और VELOCITY MORE THAN SQUARE OF VELOCITY OF LIGHT,इन सब के बीच संबंध पर खोज करेंगे तो निश्चित रुप से हम समय की वास्तविक स्थिति और फिर PAST और FUTURE तक पहुँच सकते हैं।ये मेरी अपनी परिकल्पना है,जिसपर वैज्ञानिकों को खोज करना चाहिए।HAWKING समय की वास्तविक स्थिति को दर्शाने से पहले ही भविष्य पर चले गए हैं।